- MakeMeExpert
- Posts
- Base, Instruct, Chat: Understanding the Three Faces of LLMs
Base, Instruct, Chat: Understanding the Three Faces of LLMs
Explore three common LLM types — base, instruct, and chat. Learn what each one does, when to use it, how to prompt it, and the trade-offs to expect.

Models that look similar can behave very differently. You might run the same sentence through two models and get answers that don't match. That causes wasted time, wrong choices, or awkward user experiences.
If you pick the right kind of model, you get better results with less fiddling. This is an attempt to explain what each model type does, how they differ, and when to use which one.
What a base model is
A base model is the raw language engine. It learns patterns in text and predicts what comes next. It doesn’t have extra training to follow instructions or hold a conversation — it’s just good at predicting language.
You can use a base model when you want full control. For example, researchers and developers use base models to build new systems or to experiment with custom training. But expect to write careful prompts and maybe add examples to steer it.
What an instruct model is
An instruct model is a base model tuned to follow single instructions. You give it a command, like “Summarize this paragraph,” and it tries to do that the way humans would expect. It’s been trained on instruction-response pairs and often on human feedback that rewards helpful answers.
This type works well for one-off tasks: editing, summarizing, translating, or generating a structured reply. It usually needs shorter prompts than a base model to get a useful result. But it may not handle long, multi-turn back-and-forth as naturally.
What a chat model is
A chat model is tuned for conversation. It understands roles (system, user, assistant) and keeps context across turns. It’s built to carry a dialogue, ask clarifying questions, and manage follow-up prompts.
Use chat models when you want natural back-and-forth — a helpdesk bot, an interactive tutor, or a multi-step assistant. They often include features like system messages to set behavior and safety checks so replies stay on track.
Turn AI Into Your Income Stream
The AI economy is booming, and smart entrepreneurs are already profiting. Subscribe to Mindstream and get instant access to 200+ proven strategies to monetize AI tools like ChatGPT, Midjourney, and more. From content creation to automation services, discover actionable ways to build your AI-powered income. No coding required, just practical strategies that work.
Key differences, plain and simple
Base = raw engine. Instruct = follows single commands. Chat = manages conversation. That’s the short map to remember. Each step adds layers: usability, safety, and conversational skill.
Also, instruct models tend to be easier for straightforward tasks than base models. Chat models are better when context and dialogue matter. The heavy lifting — like fine-tuning and safety filtering — is what separates them.
When to pick each one
Pick a base model if you want to build something new, like training your own behavior or integrating unusual systems. You’ll need more prompt engineering and likely more safety checks.
Pick an instruct model if you need concise, predictable outputs for single tasks: summaries, conversions, or one-shot transformations. It’s faster to get results without long prompts.
Pick a chat model if users will carry on a conversation, ask follow-ups, or expect the assistant to remember earlier messages. Chat models reduce friction in back-and-forth flows.
How to prompt each type
For base models, show examples. Few-shot prompts help a lot. Think of it like teaching by example: give a couple of input-output pairs, then the new input.
For instruct models, keep the instruction clear and direct. Say what you want and any limits. For example: “Summarize the paragraph in two sentences, keep only facts.”
For chat models, use the system role to set tone and rules, then put the user request in the user role. If the model needs to ask questions before answering, encourage that: “Ask one clarifying question if you’re missing facts.”
Trade-offs: control, cost, and speed
Base models give you fine control but need more setup. They can be cheaper per token in some setups, but you’ll spend time building the instructions or filters.
Instruct models are easier to use for single tasks and usually produce cleaner output with less back-and-forth. They may be slightly more costly than a base model tuned for bare tasks, but they save time.
Chat models add convenience for multi-turn use. They might run a bit slower because they keep context, and they often include safety layers. That trade-off is worth it when the use case needs conversation or continuity.
Quick checklist and final thought
If you want a short checklist: base = experiment and control, instruct = single clear commands, chat = conversation and memory. Match the model to the flow you expect from users.
And remember: prompts matter. Even the best model will do poorly with vague instructions. Be clear, give examples when needed, and pick the model that fits how people will actually use it.